<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<!--
  RSS generated by Inquira Information Manager
-->
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Hexagon Safety &amp; Infrastructure - Post to topic Getting the outage information back into the GIS for Engineers to use in studies...]]></title>
<link>http://support.hexagonsafetyinfrastructure.com/infocenter/index?page=home</link>
<description>Post to topic Getting the outage information back into the GIS for Engineers to use in studies...</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright © 2002, 2012, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<generator>Oracle Knowledge Information Manager</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
 

 
<item>
        <title><![CDATA[Getting the outage information back into the GIS for Engineers to use in studies...]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://support.hexagonsafetyinfrastructure.com/infocenter/index?page=forums&topic=5072025305a7809a5015a39dfcee4006615&actp=RSS]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>All,</p>

<p>I&rsquo;m sure other Intergraph shops are already doing it, so just looking for some guidance. My assumption is there is some table in InService that will give us a Transformer number or Premise number, and the number of minutes it was out for each outage. However, I&rsquo;m sure there are duplicates and bad data that we need to be taught how to weed out to get the true number of minutes. I may be completely off too and there is a completely different way of doing it. Basically what we are looking for is some way to look at a block, section of town, entire circuit, etc. and see how many outages minutes have occurred on the area of interest.</p>

<p>Thanks,</p>

<p>Joel</p>
]]></description>
        <pubDate>2017-02-16 19:15:59 Etc/GMT</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://support.hexagonsafetyinfrastructure.com/infocenter/index?page=forums&topic=5072025305a7809a5015a39dfcee4006615&actp=RSS]]></guid>
</item><item>
        <title><![CDATA[RE: Getting the outage information back into the GIS for Engineers to use in studies...]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://support.hexagonsafetyinfrastructure.com/infocenter/index?page=forums&topic=5072025305a7809a5015a39dfcee4006615&actp=RSS#5072025305a7809a5015a39dfcee40065cb]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Have you looked at the outhist table? That&#39;s what we use when extracting outage data for our outage reporting system. That&#39;s in 8.3.1.</p>
]]></description>
        <pubDate>2017-02-16 19:59:41 Etc/GMT</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://support.hexagonsafetyinfrastructure.com/infocenter/index?page=forums&topic=5072025305a7809a5015a39dfcee4006615&actp=RSS#5072025305a7809a5015a39dfcee40065cb]]></guid>
</item><item>
        <title><![CDATA[RE: Getting the outage information back into the GIS for Engineers to use in studies...]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://support.hexagonsafetyinfrastructure.com/infocenter/index?page=forums&topic=5072025305a7809a5015a39dfcee4006615&actp=RSS#5072025305a7809a5015a39dfcee4006594]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>I believe the outhist and outage_duration tables might be where you want to start Joel, then for all the impacted xfmrs maybe outhist_transformers.</p>
]]></description>
        <pubDate>2017-02-16 20:31:09 Etc/GMT</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://support.hexagonsafetyinfrastructure.com/infocenter/index?page=forums&topic=5072025305a7809a5015a39dfcee4006615&actp=RSS#5072025305a7809a5015a39dfcee4006594]]></guid>
</item><item>
        <title><![CDATA[RE: Getting the outage information back into the GIS for Engineers to use in studies...]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://support.hexagonsafetyinfrastructure.com/infocenter/index?page=forums&topic=5072025305a7809a5015a39dfcee4006615&actp=RSS#5072025305a7809a5015a39dfcee400657c]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>One caution on outhist_transformers is that, in our system, that table is reliable real time but not after the outage is completed. So for example, if the cause code or outage dates/times are changed during the outage closure, that information is not reflected in outhist_transformers but it is in outhist.</p>
]]></description>
        <pubDate>2017-02-16 20:39:45 Etc/GMT</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://support.hexagonsafetyinfrastructure.com/infocenter/index?page=forums&topic=5072025305a7809a5015a39dfcee4006615&actp=RSS#5072025305a7809a5015a39dfcee400657c]]></guid>
</item><item>
        <title><![CDATA[RE: Getting the outage information back into the GIS for Engineers to use in studies...]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://support.hexagonsafetyinfrastructure.com/infocenter/index?page=forums&topic=5072025305a7809a5015a39dfcee4006615&actp=RSS#5072025305a7809a5015a39dfcee4006503]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Agreed ... Joel, the Outage Reconciliation functionality in NetViewer/NetDispatcher manipulates the outhist and outage_duration table data only (not outhist_transformers).&nbsp; And these are where your statistical data will reside after an outage is closed (cust_minutes, etc.).</p>
]]></description>
        <pubDate>2017-02-16 21:50:39 Etc/GMT</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://support.hexagonsafetyinfrastructure.com/infocenter/index?page=forums&topic=5072025305a7809a5015a39dfcee4006615&actp=RSS#5072025305a7809a5015a39dfcee4006503]]></guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
